[digital_shades]
You have this really cool cyberpunk scenario and want to run it, but you don’t want to bother with too much rules and thick rulebooks? Then this game could be of use to you. [digital_shades] is a compact, fast paced, roleplaying game for the cyberpunk genre. The rules are simple enough that you can start playing instantly. The PDF is available for free in the download section. Print it and fold it to a cool and handy leaflet. When you play, every player needs a leaflet, because it is character sheet and rules in one.
[digital_shades] allows you to run and play all kinds of (post)cyberpunk adventures with focus on your character, the roleplaying and the scenario. No need for dice roll orgies, many pages full of complex rules and time consuming character creations.
But don’t worry, the toys are still in the game. Just make up your (post)cyberpunk setting, a scenario and play! Oh, and no more worries if your idea fits the system… As long you stay in the genre it just does it.
I hope you’ll have fun with this game on your journeys withhin the (post)cyberpunk genre.
Best regards and happy gaming
Michael C. Goran
SIMPLE Roleplaying 
At first, thank you for this great role-playing system. I have long wanted something simple yet complex like digita_shades. I have only one question about the system. If you roll a 4 or 5 in a combat there will be either complications or serious complications. What can be complications? Exampel: A player shoots at a opponent standing in front of him without cover.
Hello Pascal, thank you very much, I am happy that you like the game. 🙂
Complications can be any difficulty that is plausible within the situation. In your example several things may happen: The player’s gun could jam after the shot. The opponent could fall and hit a fire alarm box and alerting his buddies (just by chance). The sprinkler system could be triggered. Or the opponent still manages to trigger something by his own will, maybe a bomb, or an upload, or a flash grenade? Or the player character damages/destroys valuable, needed or dangerous equipment. A ricochet could start a fire in an engine room or in an industrial environment. It could damage a pressure pipe in a tight corridor. Or damage the escape vehicle during shootings in a car park. The list goes on. The complication depends on the circumstances. It may be grim, or funny, or both. Just try to make it interesting within the situation.
Will there be a fantasy version of Digital_Shades in the future?
Actually this is on the “to finish list”, along with a post apocalyptic genre adaption, a vampire genre adaption and some other stuff for digital_shades. Sadly, the development has become very slow due to other work.
Oh wow so many scenarios! Yes thats very much to do. I’ll be patient
Hi!
I’ve played several sessions using this system and everything worked just fine most of the time. But then we stumbled upon a minor issue. How are we supposed to handle different types of damage occurring in the same fight? For example, the character is first hit by a gun, and after that, he’s knocked down with a blunt leadpipe from behind. Do these damages stack? Can he still take four blunt hits, when he’s received other damage?
Hi Hendrik!
Additional damage simply goes down into the next category. In your example, the character would be in the “Hurts like Hell” category. An additional hit with a leadpipe would make him/her suffer 2 blunt damage points, bringing him/her below “You’re down” and needing medical attention. This is the basic “hard coded rule”.
Guns are more dangerous than blade oder blunt weapons, because they drop the unprotected character with one hit into dangerous health categories. Additional damage make this even worse.
However, a GM could always bring the current situation of the character into consideration. The GM could grant a character with some points in “Tough Bastard” a T.B. roll, to continue the fight or get away and collapse later. Or there could be combat drugs flowing through the blood of the charater, granting him/her this kind of rolls. Also, drama and suspense could play a role.
Have played this extensively and find it to be an excellent system. It’s very similar to one of my all time favorites, FU. (http://www.rpgnow.com/product/89534/FU-The-Freeform-Universal-RPG)
The mechanics are very close. I recommend anyone struggling with the idea of complications to check out FU for some good advice on the subject.
Firstly, thanks for making this system–it’s great!
Secondly, I had a quick question; When a character receives a bonus to their dice rolls (+1 let’s say) do they toss in an extra die or do they add one to the result of the highest die? I’m asking because I can see how that could get a little tricky with automatic fire, etc.
Example: Rags rolls his Military skill of 3 dice and comes up with 3,4 and 6. Does the +1 he gets from his “Virtual Cross-hair Overlay” allow him to roll an additional die or alter the 3 to a 4?
If the modification of the roll is the correct way to go, would that be applicable to the 4 and 6 as well?
Lastly, check out Tabletop Talk’s actual play video series “The Fieldman Theory”. Its a cyberpunk game and they’re using Digital Shades to play it. Really good stuff so far.
Thanks!
PS: I second h131v’s endorsement of the often overlooked FU.
Hi Rangereric18!
( I am so sorry, for posting it so late. 😦 I had a turbulent month with some trips and caught a really bad cold. Still fighting it off… )
A plus bonus just means, that you add the bonus to your roll. You do not roll additional dice.
So, in your example Rags would get the bonus from the Virtual Cross-hair Overlay to all his three dice results: He rolled 3,4 6. His final results would be 4, 5, 7. (The seven simlpy counts as a six.)
I must finally check out FU! Thanks for the reminder! 🙂
Oh, and thank you the the hint about Tabletop Talk! 🙂
Thanks for getting back and no worries about posting late. 🙂
After having watched all of the Tabletop Talk episodes using Digital Shades, I found that they had an elegant idea for dealing with unskilled rolls; Instead of rolling a d6 and subtracting 2 from the total, they just roll a d4.
What do you think? Is that feasible?
Thanks!
Hi!
To use a d4 instead of 1d6-2 for an unskilled roll is possible, but it changes the probability of the outcome.
With 1d6-2 (without upgrades or other bonuses):
There is a chance for approx. 32% to score a succes and approx. 64% for a fail.
With 1d4 (without upgrades or other bonuses):
The chance for a succes or a failure are 50% each.
I recommend that you use the method you like most. It also depends on the style of play the group likes. When I created the rules, I had in mind that a unskilled attempt should be difficult and have the flavour of danger. So I chose an success rate of about 1/3. But that is just my personal preference. 🙂
About this “But what if you don’t have the competence for the significant action? In this case, your character does not really know what she or he is doing. Roll a single die and substract 2.”
I suggest to change the rule and roll 2 dice, choosing the lowest one. Elegant solution, no -1 and 0 results, slightly chance to roll a 5 or a 6, and overall still a very difficult roll.
PS: change the “substract” in “subtract”.
A few questions if you please:
*Could you give examaples of some NPCs stats ? (I know it is personal, and depends on the type of game we run, but I always have troubles judging how good normal NPCs are compared to Players).
* How would you rule a decision to target a specifi part of the body (i.e. headshot)?
a malus (-1/2) to a roll?? an increased damage if the shot is successful?
By the way, I recreated and uploaded a sheet for your game on roll20, giving you credits for the wonderful little game. I am still waiting for it to be accepted and eligible.
Hi laresgod!
Thank you very much for the roll20 thing! Let me know, if I can help. (I am not on roll20 yet, but I always wanted to check that out.)
Let’s got to your questions. 🙂
NPCs
You can create the stats of an NPC easily if you ask yourself: “Who is that person and how competent would he/she usually be?”
– One competence box filled means the NPC is trained in that field, but has not much experience. Alternatively, it could just mean talent without training, or a little knowledge of some stuff, a mediocre position within an organisation, or once higher skill that was neglected over time, or simply skill that was not trained above base level.
– Two boxes filled means the NPC is a professional in that field, or came so far by experience over the time.
– Three filled boxes represent the skill or position of a master in that field.
How many competence and upgrade points a NPC has, depends on the GM. NPCs can also have disadvantages, of course.
Let’s meet some quick NPCs:
“Razor” is a young ganger who lives several years on the street now. She knows her turf and some fences and smugglers in the area. Razor loves to get drunk with other gangers and to provoke mean knife fights. Stats: Back Ally 1, Bone Breaker 2, Gang 1, Tough Bastard 1. Disadvantage: Always looks guilty or criminal. Upgrades: None.
“Chief Jericho” is the leading officer of precinct eleven in [future city]. He is an old school cop who doesn’t take any lame ass excuses from his cops and seems always angry. He is well connected within the force and city officials. Over 25 years in the force now, he was shot several times, but always recovered quickly due to his strong will. Stats: Big Money 1 or 2, Badge (more than 3), Bone Breaker 1, Connections 2, Credibility 1, Detective 2, Guns 1, Tough Bastard 2. Disadvantage: Choleric. Upgrades: Enhanced Senses and Voice Stress Analyzer.
“Mariko Takimoto” is a hard hitting business shark. She is well educated, spirited and deeply corrupt. She holds a Phd in genetics and the position as CEO of New Pharma International. Stats: Big Money X (that stat is not important for Mariko, because she owns millions), Connections (at least) 3, Deals 3, Know How: Genetics 2, Urbane 2. Disadvantage: Always has some financial fraud running. Upgrades: Uplink with A.I. Assistant.
“José Delgrado” aka “ACID” is a respected net jockey in the local hacker scene. He is friednly to newcomers and takes one or two of them sometimes under his wing. ACID has become more like a well known community manager these days, than a heavy hitter in the net. That is the case because he has a dirty little secret. He was caught and made a deal. José works now as a secret police informer. Stats: Connections 1, Credibility 2, Gang 1 (local code boyz/girlz), Hacker 2, Show-off 2. Upgrades: Uplink with Advanced Hacking Suite.
“The Nun” is a professional assassin. You want someone dead? You want it done properly? You pay good? You call The Nun. Period! Her past is a mystery, but there are rumors. She always wears the clothes of a nun and she is always loaded with weapons. She never blinks. Was she in the military? Why the religous outfit? Is she even human or some sort of discharged kill bot? Or is she just a myth? Stats: Bone Breaker 3, Detective 1, Guns 3, Military 2, Runner 1, Shadow 1, Tough Bastard 2. Disadvantage: None. Upgrades: Many.
Targetig specific Body Parts
I would use a malus of -1 for legs, torso and arms, during a wiggly streetfight. A headshot needs a total result of 6 (Bullseye effect from the combat table would apply in this case).
A sniper PC/NPC would take time to aim (+1 on the roll) and could do a headshot with just a successful roll, if the target is unaware. If it is aware and doing counter measures (like running in a zig zag pattern), the headshot would be made at -1 (because of the counter measures) and needs a total result of 6, as above. The sniper could/would again take time to aim to negate the malus.
I hope I could help. 🙂
Thank you very much for your reply and all the NPCs , I will be sure to use them in one of my future adventures.
I plan something simple (run, hide or hit).
This is my idea for a starting adventure:
” Every night after work you go to the bar “the Oasis” to relex, enjoy a drink among friends and check the lastest juicy rumours that could lead to a contract. Tonight is no different but Razor, a young ruffian from the Streets, always looking for trouble, just came in with “business” for Jack the barman and a smile that can only mean trouble. You noticed she was carrying a metallic suitcase, quite unusual for her.
They have gone to the back for quite some time now. But wait… what now? … Why are the Black Tears gangers showing up now? They don’t come up here…”
And check your digital sheet on roll20, apparently it has been accepted. In the meantime, this is what it looks like:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwQxJBcvkYkLNTV6NkNpdDllV2c/view?usp=sharing
Very cool! Thank you! I am looking forward to use it on roll20 in the future. 🙂
Hey there! First thing first, thx for this very cool rules lite system Michael! 😉
So here’s my question : how do you handle the opposition rolls in The Simple System?
For instance, when two bad asses start fighting each other with katanas, how do you distinguish the good fencer (Samourai skill : 3) of the not so good fencer (skill 1)? Here’s what I suggest : both of them roll and the biggest result wins the round. Plain simple. In case of a tie, the guy with the more dice in his pool, wins it.
So to follow my example above, let’s say that the better fencer gets a 2, 3 and 5 as a result and the other a 5 as well. That should be a tie but as the first guy’s got 3 dice in his pool, he breaks the tie and inflicts his regular damage to his opponent.
What do you think?
Hi DreamArgonaut! Thanks for the kind words, I am happy that you like the game! 🙂
I handle opposition rolls at my table exactly as you show in your example. 🙂
(In case anybody preferes rerolls: To let them both reroll on a tie would work fine too, because the better fencer has still far better chances.)
Thx for the reply! Actually got my very first game using the SIMPLE system and it worked awesomely great! My player loved it, and so did I and it allowed us to get thru lots of nervous-gritty action sequences very quickly to stay focus on the story.
So very great job you did here.
Besides, I’ve got another question : what’s the next setting you’re working on if any? I was thinking, you could do something interesting w/ it for a star-wars (ish) universe? Maybe also for a sword & sorcery style? Well, just some random thoughts!
Happy that the game did so well with your session, thanks for the praise! 😀
Something like that is already in the pipeline:
“STARBLIND” will be the next SIMPLE setting adaption. It’s a general Sci Fi version of the SIMPLE system. One could play star-wars-ish or star-trek-is or general sci fi sessions with it. Sven Weber (he made the full color layout for the game) build it and we already playtested it. We have to check some tiny things, and then it will be uploaded on the blog.
Sven and me also work on a “special / secret” ( 🙂 ) project for [digital_shades]. I hope we will finish it soon.
Another fan mailed me a fantasy hack of the SIMPLE system called “AVENTURIA”. It is very cool, but currently just an early draft and he still works on it. I would love to post the hack on the blog when it’s finished.
I am currently working to write fair copys of some [digital_shades] scenarios I wrote and GMed some time ago. They are still a mix of typed and hand written stuff.
Further, there are two other setting adaptions / creations, but they are still conceptual.
One (first of all: me) could wish the output to be faster, however, but due to real life things (work and stuff) it takes time.
But I am so happy because of the people who like SIMPLE and care about the game, people like you and your gaming buddies, and others who play and support it! 🙂
I am being curious about AVENTURIA you just mentioned. I am not a fan of medfan but I wondered how to hack and adapt your system.
Could you give the link?
At the moment there is no link available, sorry. Because it is an early draft, the author wants to work on it.
Currently it’s written only in German, but I can ask him if I can put it online anyway – please tell me if you are still interested and I contact him. 🙂
I am, although I can’t read German I could try a google translation just to have a rough understanding.
Hi, it will be in the download section soon.
It is up now. Please go to the download section and scroll down.
Hi Michael! So after my last game of DS I’ve been thinking about couple things that may (or better said “will”) happen during a cyberpunk game and would love to get your view about it :
– how do you deal with two weapons fighting? It’s just a matter of time for one of my player to ask me how he could shoot with his two awesome/deadly looking SMG at the same time! So here’s what I propose : just divide the number of dice you’ve got in Guns between the two weapons? It’s not very helpful, that’s true, in the situation explained above using the burst fire rule but still, if lucky you could get two 6s.
Another simple way to look at it would be to just increase the damage of such weapons but still counting as one. For instance, if you are using a SMG, it would cause 2damages instead of the regular 1. What do you think?
– now just to have a bit of a clarification about health and damages : if a character reaches the “hurts like hell” section of his health box and suffers 3 damages (like a 6 dealt with a 2 damages weapon) so he’s dead, plain and simple? Because, as I understood it, after the “hurts like hell” line you get to KO, then to the part when he needs urgent medical attention and then only death. Did I get that right?
– I know the SIMPLE game system is made to remain well simple and I really do love it as it is now, but would it be maybe possible to add some effects regarding certain weapons, just to get a bit more variety than just the same amount of damage? To give you an example, maybe the shotgun could work like a SMG at close range using the burst fire rule but doing just 1dmg? (for the spread of projectiles this nasty things are capable of dealing) But otherwise it would remain as you said : a 2dmg weapon?
How many damage do you think a heavy weapon, like a Heavy Machine Gun-like might cause? Last time, my PCs were confronted to a corporate VTOL loaded with such a weapons. When some of them were hit I just asked for a TB check to see if they survived (but still needed medical attention urgently!) or not. Maybe it was overpowered a little bit, hence my question. I was thinking maybe 3 damage points would do the trick w/o the armor being able to protect (unless it’s like a heavy armor type)? Or would deal with it as per the explosive weapon rule? (in short : Hit=dead)
– Is it possible for a PC (or a NPC as well in that matter) to exceed the 3 skill points cap? And if so does he need just 1xp to reach the 4th point as usual or does he need like 2xps (or more)?
Thx in advance for ur replies but I have to say that’s what I love about this game : I mean you can easily customize it as you see fit.
Keep on doing the good work! 🙂
Greg
I agree with you, heavy weapons and hard armor are need.
Heavy weapon can do only 2 damage but ignore soft armor ( the default armor in game) .
Hard armor can stop heavy weapons like default armor in game and can stop one damage of other weapons (all resting damage is blunt). In the same way we can add a new upgrade for android body, the hard armor.
Hi Greg and Micka!
Thank you for the nice words! 🙂
I will soon give detailed replies on your questions.
Cheers!
Michael
Hi !
How “perfect beauty” augmentation is working ? The rules say that give +1 but for what ?
In the same way, how can be defined a natural beauty without augmentations ?
Hi Micka!
Perfect Beauty may give (GM’s decision depending on the situation) a +1 bonus to social rolls, e.g. to Deals, Credibility, Show-off. Depending the situation of the roll, also to Gang, Know-How and Connections or even Urbane.
Natural beauty is not mechanically supported by [digital_shades] like in other RPGs. But you can define the beauty of your character in “self”, if you want. The GM may grant you the positive circumstance bonus, depending on the situation, but this should not be a surrogate to Perfect Beauty. Natural beauty is often outmoded by artifical beauty modification in Cyberpunk Stories. Which are sometimes weird, beacuse it is inceredibly beautyful, but too perfect to be true, though.
Hi !
Sorry for my multiple posts, I did not see them and I thought they were not posted.
For beauty, I think that the game could have a new skill to have spécific application to charm people with boby language. Show-off is for impress like a one man show or a expressive man. I see Show-off like a projection of the personnality not a projection of a sensual approach.
This new skill could be called : Vamp
Vamp : Seduce, ask for something with a smile, give pleasure , to attract attention , distract a target.
Like Tough Bastard that can defined a muscular guy, Vamp can be a combinaison of natural beauty and cosmetic enhancement.
And, Perfect beauty augmentation can add +1 to this specific skill.
What do you think about this ?
I agree with you heavy weapons and hard armor is needing.
For exemple heavy weapons can deal 2 damage but regular armor can t stop them. Hard armor can stop heavy weapons and can remove 1 damage from normal weapons before transform to blunt.
Hi Mick!
I will soon reply to that. 🙂
nice idea about the VAMP skill.
Hi Mick!
Introducing “Vamp” as a new competence and bringing it in combination with Perfect Beauty is a really good idea. I like it so much, I think I will integrate it in the game. Thank you so much! 😀
I can’t tell when I will update the main document. So, I recommend to use it in Know-How so far, until the update will happen and Vamp becomes a standard competence.
Thank to you for your game 😉
Digital shade is very simple and easy to use. I think use it for cyberpunk 2020 and I would to think about more games options.
For exemple I think that the game need :
– Heavy weapons :
Heavy weapon deal 2 bang damages but soft armor can’t stop them.
– soft armor : same as default armor.
– Hard armor :
If damages are blunt, all of them are stop. If damages are Sharp or bang she stop 1 damage and all resting damage deal blunt damage.
– A rule about explosive “less deadly” :
Draw d6 to escape explosiion if you can (hand grenade) on 1 you die, on 2 you take 2 bang damage, on 3 you take 1 bang damage, on 4 you take 2 blunt damages, on 5 you take 1 blunt damage, on 6 you take nothing. Hard armor can reduce damage by 1.
– A module about hacking ( navigation into system ).
– A module about vehicles (cars, drones, truck, motorbike, tank, arachnide quadripod of war, Assisted armor, Tachicoma light tank, flying car, airplane…), not a list but a construction rule.
Eventualy :
– A more new Cybernetics upgrades (like heavy plated->a hard armor for combat’s cyborgs).
And don’t forget that the community can help you ;).
My reflexion about Hacking :
The architecture of the information system is a canvas as with nodes interconnected around one or more cores.
Each node represents a terminal like computer, a wifi entry point, a server, or all interactive device where humans could connect or could interact physically. Some terminals can control a device list
(like databases, gun turrels, cameras, doors, …).
Each node has security points between 0 and 4. When security points fall to 0, you can take the control of all devices attached to the attacked node.
Each core has security points between 5 and 10. When security points fall to 0, you can destroy the core. If all system cores are done, all the system is done.
When you try to enter into the system by a node, or if you try to attack a node or a core. You must be on the node (or the core) to attack it.
1 : you fail and the system detects you and locates your position.
2 : you fail and the system detects you. The system locates you, if you fail one of the next hacking rolls, or if you do nothing.
3 : you fail and the system is on alert.
4 : Choose: you fail without concequences, or you remove one security point, but the system is on alert.
5 : you remove one security point.
6 : you remove two security points.
Sometime, a user already use the node that you want attack. So your hacking rolls is modified by -1. If your action is too suspicious the user could be alerted and can attack you if he is a hacker too.
When a hacker attacks another one he must choose type of damages he want dealing : blunt to disable or bang to kill (but you can choose to loose a cognitive upgrade instead).
1 : You fail your opponent deal you 2 damages of choosing type.
2 : You fail your opponent deal you 1 damages of choosing type.
3 : you fail no damages
4 : Choose : succeed you deal and recieve 1 damages of choosing type.
5 : You deal 1 damages of choosing type.
6 : You deal 2 damages of choosing type.
Once in the system, when you try to move to an adjacent node point you need to make a hacking roll :
1 : you fail and the system detects you and locates your position.
2 : you fail and the system detects you. The system locates you, if you fail one of the next hacking rolls, or if you do nothing.
3 : you fail and the system is on alert.
4 : Choose: you fail without concequences or you move to an adjacent node, but the system is on alert.
5 : you move to an adjacent node.
6 : you move to an adjacent node, and you can repeat this operation.
When the system is on alert, it modify your next hacking roll by -1.
When the system detects you, it launches the alert and tries to find the terminal ID which you are connected. You can always act in the matrix, but all the next hacking rolls by -1.
When the system locates you, you can do nothing except try to log out. The system call the securty agents and can attack you immediately :
# The White systems just logout intruder and prevents his ID to login again .
# The Red systems try to make fall the intruders into unconsciousness. They lock the hacker in the matrix, and deal one blunt damages each turn.
# The black systems try to kills the intruders. They lock the hacker in the matrix, They deal one bang damage each turn, but you can choose to loose a cognitive upgrade instead.
To logout from the matrix, when you are located, you need a hacking roll :
1 : you fail, the system inflicts damages to you, and you can not log out anymore.
2 : you fail and the system inflicts damages to you.
3 : you fail
4 : choose : you fail or you succeed but the system inflicts damages to you.
5 : You succeed.
6 : you succeed and you bluff the system on your position in the real world.
NEW Cognitive UPGRADE under Uplink :
Combat firewall : Convert one bang damage from black system into a blunt damage.
Hacking V2
The architecture of the information system is a canvas with nodes interconnected.
Each node can represent a terminal. It can be a computer, a wifi door, a server, or all interactive device where humans could interact physically. Some terminal can control some devices like databases, gun turrels, cameras, doors, or others things. If you control a terminal, you have access to the system, but more importantly, you can control its devices.
Some node are cores, the hearts of system. They can be one or more, but if all of them are disabled, the system is done.
All Nodes have security points between 0 and 4. To hack a node, you must do fall the node security points to 0. You take the control of it, if it’s a terminal, or you disable it, if it’s a core. Otherwise you need to have the good login ID.
Once in the system, each turn, you can move on all nodes that accept your current login ID and you can control it. Otherwise you need to sneak with hacking.
You do not have to take the control of next node, if you just want to go on it. But you need to be on it to hack it.
When you try…
…to enter into the system by a terminal, without an authorized login ID
…to hack the node or the core where you are.
…to sneak in the matrix.
Do the same as in “doing things” with hacker competence, but use the hacking table below :
1 : Bad fail : You miss and the system detects you.
2 : Fail : You miss and the system is on alert.
3 : No fail, but no success either : you may transform it into a “brut force”, but the system detect you.
4 : Brut force: you remove one security point or you can move to an adjacent node, but the system is on alert.
5 : Success : you remove one security point or you can move to an adjacent node.
6 : Good success : You remove two security points or you can move to an adjacent node twice or the system loses your track.
When the system is on alert, it modify your next hacking roll by -1.
When the system detects you, it tries to find the terminal ID which you are connected. You can always act in the matrix, but all the next hacking rolls by -1 until the system loses your track. If you fail one of the next hacking rolls, or if you do nothing the next turn, the system locates you.
When the system locates you, it logs you out and banned your login ID. Then he calls securty officers. The White systems do nothing else, but the reds introduces, in addition, a GPS virus into intruder’s devices to find them in the real world. The blacks systems is like the reds but do two bang damages in addition (you can choose to loose a cognitive upgrade instead).
Sometime, a user already use the node that you want attack. So your hacking rolls is modified by -1. If your action is too suspicious the user could be alerted.
NEW Cognitive UPGRADE under Uplink :
Combat firewall : Convert bang damage from black system into a blunt damage.
#### Work in progress ####
– battle between hackers
Hacking V3
The architecture of the information system is a canvas with nodes interconnected. It may have one or more layers of colors between white, red and black.
Each node can represent a core (the hearts of system) or a terminal (all interactive devices where humans could interact physically like a computer). Some terminal can control some devices like
databases, gun turrels, cameras, doors, or others things. All Nodes have security points between 0 and 4.
To access the system , you must go physically to a terminal and control it, with a login ID or a hacking.
Once in the system, at every turn, you can move from one node to another, without the need to control them. They must accept your current login ID. Otherwise, you have to sneak you with hacking.
To try to take control of a terminal and its attached devices, or disable a core, you must be on his node and hack it, until you drop its security points to 0, or you use an accredited login ID instead.
If all cores are disabled, the system is done.
When you try…
…to enter into the system by a terminal, without an accredited login ID
…to hack the node or the core.
…to sneak in the matrix.
Do the same as in “doing things” with hacker competence, but use the hacking table below :
1 : Bad fail : You failed and the system detects you.
2 : Fail : You just failed.
3 : No fail, but no success either : you may transform it into a “Forcing”, but the system detect you.
4 : Forcing: you remove one security point or you can move to an adjacent node, but the system is on alert.
5 : Success : you remove one security point or you can move to an adjacent node.
6 : Good success : You remove two security points or you can move to an adjacent node twice or the system loses your track.
When the system is on alert: It modify your next hacking roll by -1.
When the system detects you: He moves from one node to another , starting from each cores, until it finds one to which you are connected. All the next hacking rolls by -1 until the system loses your track.
When the system locates you: it disconnects you banned your login ID and launches Protocol in accordance with its color. Then he called securty officers.
White systems do nothing else.
Red systems attempt to know the intruder and his location with spywares or requests the legal databases.
Blacks systems do 2 “bang” damages to hackers connected by brain (may choose to loose a cognitive upgrade instead), or destroys his device.
Sometime, a user already use the node that you want attack. So your hacking rolls is modified by -1. If your action is too suspicious the user could be alerted.
Before going into the matrix, the hacker can selects a combination softwares (that can be them same), equal to twice its hacking competence. They are loaded in the memory of his device, until they are used. The hacker must log out to reload a new list.
# NEW Toy for hacker:
this is a list of softwares that can use hackers.
Cloak: Prevents the system or hackers, to detecting you, this turn.
Shield: Prevents you or your device taking damage into the matrix, this turn.
Break: Drop to 0, the security points of the hacked terminal.
Lure: Gives a false name and a false node location when the system locates you. You are disconnected, but the system can not apply the color’s events.
Strike: Do 2 “bang” damages at connected human with brain, or ejects it from the matrix.
Nuke: Destroys a terminal (it can no longer be controlled.), or the connexion’s device of a hacker, or remove two security’s points of a core.
Beacon: Marks a node in the system that is not a core. When you log in again , you can go to this node instantly. Once started, it remains active, until it is removed, or the system reboot.
Hoover: Copies a database on your device that you can read later.
Deamon: Places a daemon on a controlled terminal. You can use its attached devices later, wherever you are in the system.
Spy: Introduces a spy in a device that you can find later in the matrix. Once started, it remains active, until it is removed.
Ninja: Move in the matrix, without need hacking, and you are invisible for others hackers. Once started, it remains active, until you hack a node or attacked a hacker.
Dog: Locates every hackers into the system, that don’t use a ninja software. Once started, it remains active all the time.
# NEW Cognitive UPGRADE under Uplink :
Combat firewall : Convert bang damage from black system into a blunt damage.
# Hackers combat
You must use a dog software to seek hackers. All hackers can be found instantly if they have been detected by system. To attack another hacker, you must be on the same node. The more skilled hacker can launch its programmes first, and his target launches his programme in response.
Wow folks! Thank you very much for so much imput! Let’s do this systematically.
First, to DreamArgonaut.
Clarification on the health meter:
If a character’s health sinks below K.O. she/he is out and dying, but can still be saved with medical attention. If a character takes another hit she/he is dead. Example: “Razor” is hit by a bullet from a rifle. She is unprotected and takes two bang damage, so she is k.o. After that, she is hit by a bullet from a pistol. Now she is bleeding out and dying. She could be safed, though, but another bullet finds its target and kills her on the spot.
New Weapon Effects and Two weapons Fighting:
I am working on an optional rule addon. It will contain rules for machineguns, shotguns, two weapons fighting etc. Currently it is all still experimental, but as an example, a MG would do 3 bang damages per hit. A MG is incredible deadly, unprotected characters would be dying (but still saveable) and protected characters must roll Tough Bastard. Anyway, a MG is fully automatic, so maybe a second salvo hits and kills the particular character.
A speciality occurs When the character is fighting (only) goons with a MG: You roll the dice as normal, but the numbers of the successful dice count as casualties of the goons. A MG is very good at mowing down enemies, but also player characters.
Two Weapons Fighting is also a thing, there are multiple solutions. I didn’t decide on one yet, but I would go with the dividing of the number of dice in two rolls (like 1/1 or 1/2). That would keep the damage as standard and give the chance on up to 4 bang damage points.
Exceed the 3 skill points cap:
In the basic game, it is not possible to exceed the 3 point cap. Of course, you can modify the game, but the dice propabilities would be changed. As long as you keep that in mind, why not play the game as you like. 🙂
The propability of reaching 4 (a lower success) is with 1d6 = 49%, with 2d6 = 75% and with 3d6 = 87%. Hence, a character with 3 dots in a competence will succeed most of the time, but there is still room to fail. If you add a fourth dot, the success chance would be 94%. The room to fail would be really small. But if you like to play with a fourth dot, I recommend not to make the players pay two points for the fourth dot. Just let it cost one point as usual, but restrict the cap for starting characters at three dots.
(Also, don’t forget that an Upgrade basically negates the chance to roll a one.)
I also think about how to improve the combat experience with options.
For example I think about defensive option. When you are attacked in the turn you can escape/dodge/go under cover/ jump to the ground. You don’t need to roll dice, but the attacker modify his roll by -1.
For damage weapons, I think that minigun is better with 2 bang damages with automatic tag. But I will be great to introduce hard armor. With it, you can say “Soft armor (default armor in game) is useless versus minigun”. The minigun will dangerous. In this heavy weapon categorie you can add plasma riffle.
Explosive weapon like rpg or grenade could be deal 1 or 2 damages (the same in blunt if target is out of core explosion). They cannot be stop !!!
So a RPG with 2 bang damage kill all people !
And now you can introduce a third type of armor only for vehicle, the plating armor.
It stop 2 damages and convert the reasting damage to blunt.
Plating armor stop light gun, rifle (except with a 6 on dice) and reduce heavy weapon effect.
I will post a better formal rule where I will do a brainstorming.
Modified combat rules V1
(some rule are the sames that originale rules)
# Initiative:
People declare their intents, then actions are resolved based on skill rank. If they are not surprised, people with the highest ranking competence , act first.
People with the same rank at the same skill, act at the same time. People with the same rank at different skill, act in order of the fiction (climb a wall takes more time than a gun shot).
Each turn , people can make a short movement and perform an action such as do an attack, do a defense , or do something that can be done in one turn.
Otherwise people can run or do an action that take more that one turn, like a lockpicking.
# Fighting:
To attack a target, do the same as in “doing things”, but use the combat table below. Positive or negative circumstances may modify your roll by +1 or –1.
Your target may declare defend herself before you resolve your action, but she can do nothing else in this turn, except doing a short move. If she do, modify your roll by -1.
1: Bad Fail: You miss your target and may hit a bystander or one of your team, or your weapon just jams.
2: Fail: You just missed.
3: No fail, but no success either: You may transform it into a “glancing blow” but accept a severe complication. But if the target has cover herself, you hit the cover instead anyway, and if the target defends herself, you just missed.
4: Glancing Blow: You did it, but somehow a complication appears. But if the target has cover, you hit the cover instead anyway, and if the target defends herself, you just missed.
5: You hit it. Well done.
6: Bullseye! Do an additional damage point. You may choose to pass on this extra damage, but gain some other advantage, like hitting the target in an unprotected spot or defeating a minor goon instantly.
When a character hurts someone she / he inflicts one damages point to the relevant health category of the target. The category depends on what kind of damage the weapon inflicts:
“Blunt” is non-lethal damage, inflicted by punch or contondant weapons.
“Sharp” is serious damage inflicted by sharp and piercing weapons, include bow.
“Bang ” is fatal damage inflicted by ballistic or energy weapons.
# Armor:
Soft armor transforms sharp and bang damage to blunt damage.
Hard armor stops one damage and transforms remaining damages, sharp and bang,
into blunt damage.
—> New upgrade only for android body : Hard armor plating: Give hard armor to
your artificial body.
# Weapons:
Small weapons like Punchs, knifes, pistols, submachine guns, inflict one points
of damage.
Medium weapons like rifles, sword, shotguns, clubs, inflict two points of damage.
Heavy weapons like machine guns, chainsaws, grenades, sniper or energy rifles, inflict two points of damage, but cannot be stop by soft armor.
Explosive weapons, like RPG, kill or destroy instantly, but on a “glancing blow” only some splints hit and do two points of sharp damage.
# Full automatic fire allows as many attacks as dice you roll. In this case each diceresult counts as one attack. These attacks may be distributed between differend targets.
# Two weapons fighting need a relevant skill rank of 2 or higher. Separate your dice in half and make two attack rolls changed by -1.
# Aim with firearms, without automatic fire, add a +1 bonus to specific rolls.
# Special high tech devices may add a +1 bonus to specific rolls.
# Tear gas makes you substract 1 from all rolls.
# Toxic gas inflict one “blunt” each turn.
# Taser weapons knock a character out instantly.
# Make a »Tough Bastard« roll to see if she / he can avoid this.
# EMPs shutdown upgrades and electronic hardware for a scene.
There are a lot of nice and cool ideas, Mick! We could use them to make a “Combat Addon” for [digital_shades]. 🙂 Would you contact me via email, please (trapezoeder[at]gmail.com) ? I also have another question.
Hi. One thing about autofire weapons. I’d change the rules, as they stand a skilled character has higher chances of rolling a fumble at some point than a lowly-skilled character. I think it would work better if an automatic weapon granted a number of attacks equal to the skill dice+1. Each attack is executed using all of the character’s dice as usual.
Hi, Passerby,
I was unavailable for some longer time.
The autofire and unskilled rules are currently under revision anyway, because there are some issues.
I am open to suggestions, so thank you for your very interesting idea. It flows straight into consideration. 🙂
Loving the simplicity of the system. I plan on testing it out on a few friends of mine soon. They were impressed with the pamphlets I made and how everything you need to know is all right there.
After reading through the rules, I’ve already created some of my own home brew rules and equipment lists to flesh the game out a bit more. I know my players love shopping for stuff. If you’re interested in what I’ve come up with so far just let me know.
Been reading the rules and I really like how simple the system is, but flexible enough to where you can add more complexity if you really wanted to. I’ve been showing my players the system and they like the pamphlet setup. We’re looking for an alternative to Shadowrun, as some of my players are a bit daunted by the system and I think this may fit in nicely.
To add a bit more complexity to the game, I’ve created some house rules and an equipment list with price tags to give the setting a bit more substance. Nothing too far out there, but something to differentiate the weapons. If anyone is interested in what I’ve come up with I can post it.
Thank you very much, guys! Of course I am interested in your stuff and I am sure others are too, so please post! 🙂
Awesome! 🙂
Here’s a link to my work in progress on Google Drive:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ZhVOG7JkU0eGCQ1dGBFdAA1u2PyIgoZC9mnzVC_bQpk
If you would prefer, I can just copy and paste the text on the message board. If anyone has any questions on what I’ve got in the file, just let me know.
All items are priced in a currency I call Creds, as well as the level of authority needed to have the item without legal ramifications. The weapon names are generic so you can create your own using the list for that weapon. There are at least 3 kinds of weapons per type to keep them varied and any additional modifications can be made at the GMs discretion. I’ve also invented a few special rules for weapons, as well as optional rules for complications to make weapons unique. Weapon types range from standard to high powered experimental weapons for truly brutal scenarios.
I also have armor rules, but I need to do some play testing to see if they are balanced correctly. The next part I’m working on is equipment items and additional upgrade options.
It’s all a work in progress, so any suggestions would be appreciated. Please feel free to use any of my rules or modify them as you see fit.
Sorry but I dislike your idea.
I have read your document and it feel like a cyberpunk 2020 catalogue.
Weapons and armor must be simple. Just put into few categorie (light weapon, medium, heavy and explosive). Indeed some weapons could have some precision like a EMP riffle but don’t need to detail all weapons type.
This is my way with Digital Shade Cyborg edition that I write with Prisma. Add somes details but stay generic.
Thanks for your feedback and I understand the need to keep things simple. There is a kind of freedom when you distill the game to its basic elements and don’t sweat the minutia.
Most of the rules I came up with and weapon lists are really advanced options in case my players want a little bit more chunky bits to the game. My players come from a Cyberpunk/Shadowrun environment (you spotted how my list looks like a Cyberpunk catalog, which was intentional) , so I thought I would come up with some similar rules, yet not be as complex as the fore mentioned RPG systems. The complexity of those systems kept slowing down the game to the point I started throwing out rules or just home brewing. That’s what I love about the Digital Shades system, it’s modular enough to handle advanced rules if needed, but the core is solid and straightforward. The rules and lists I came up with won’t be for everyone, but there are some idea to spark home brew rules, which I am a big fan of. Like any RPG system, treat is like a salad bar; take what you want and leave the rest.
Regardless, I can’t wait to see what revisions and options you and Prisma come up with. It’s even possible my players may like the core mechanics so much all my advance work could be for nothing. We’ll find out during our first play though after the holidays when I wrap up my campaign. Even if they don’t use my rules, it felt good being creative, which is what RPGing is all about.
Dont worry I like you, I come from Cyberpunk 2020 game. If I like the background and if when I had 15 I like big gun and lot of stuff, now I find something like simple. It’s for this explanation that I like D_S, because you can be concentrated in the story not in the stuff.
Even in the Cyborg version you have some specific weapons with description as EMP gun or very heavy sniper (tank killer).
I think that the Cyborg version will be available soon. With Prisma, we have some points to discute before, because in the playtest some details, coming from the normal version, ask us. I speak about autofire and unskilled check.
When this points and all correction are done (and some graphical design) the cyborg version will be here, but not to remplace the normal version. It will be a new version that will exist with the normal version.
Players will choose.
Thanks for sharing, Wayne! 🙂 I think every group has its own needs and preferences. About the different editions: Like Mick wrote, “the cyborg edition” of [digital_shades] is a more fleshed out / advanced edition with additional stuff and rules. While the cyborg edition will be around 4-5 pages long, the classic edition of [digital_shades] will keep its one sheet of paper layout. Players and GMs will decide which edition they prefere for the scenario and the circumstances of play. The base of both editions is still the same, so one should feel comfortable with both versions and even switching between them.
Hey Mike, quick mechanics question;
How do you handle two or more characters using competencies to achieve the same goal?
Bad example, but if they’re all trying to move some heavy furniture, do they all roll TB and keep the highest result? Do you just add a flat bonus to the lead rolling character based on how many helpers he has?
Hi, you can use what you like more. In the past I used this method: To achive the heavy goal, the PCs have to bring X successes (e.g. two or three). Each player rolls and see if s/he can contribute. A result of six helps more, of course.
Looks good! Presumably you can use the rules with any setting you like (steampunk, fantasy, military, whatever), by just changing the abilities/upgrades?
Hi Thomas!
Indeed, easy modification is intended. 🙂
This system is awesome! Friends and I played a short 6-installment campaign. I love that digital_shades gives a cool cyberpunk scaffolding without getting lost in the weeds. Most the adventure has been rad conversation and roleplaying punctuated by hacking and/or punching peoples’ faces off. So thank you!
Dear Chris H, thank you very much! I’m happy that you guys like the game! 😀
Hi,
Thank you very much for this system! As I’m currently working on my own simplified system, digital shades were recomended to me as a great example of a simple RPG. And I must admit, you did a good job! Rolls are simple, mechanics are clear and the upgrades system differentiate characters in the team.
I just have few questions for you on how you deal with certain situations –
– How do you handle tasks with different difficulty? Do you just request a -1/+1 on the roll, or do you have some other ways of dealing with it?
– A grenade lands on the floor, our punks try to jump away to avoid certain death. What roll do you request to test their reflexes?
– How would you handle a melee assassination? A character sneaks up from behind to a guard and tries to cut his throat/break his neck without making much noise. Would you just use the “Shadow” skill, or maybe something else?
Hi Pietriej,
Thank you very much! 😀
The mechanic way to handle difficulty is the -1/+1 rule. The positve / negative modifier is aprox. 16% and provides an effect that is strong enough in the positive or negative way on a six sided die. A normal roll (no modifier) works for a “challenging” task and -1 for a really difficult one. Also, you could adapt on the situation and rule that success is only possible on a “Natural 6” roll (think about possible modifiers from upgrades), because it is so really really hard core.
A grenade hits the floor… I had this situation in in the past several times. 😀 “Runner” is the classic way to handle this. However, one could also use “Military” (the character has been trained to react properly to such a threat) or maybe a suitable “Know how” competence.
Melee: It depends on the situation. “Shadow”, “Bone Breaker” and “Samurai” are suitable competences for such a task. If the character is very near on his target, like s/he has just to make one, two steps and grab the target, I would allow all three possibilities. It the character has to sneak his way up to the target, e.g. across a large room, “Shadow” should be used.
I hope I could answer your questions satisfactory. Just write if you have more or want to comment. 🙂 My reply can be sometimes take its time, due to work stuff…
, … but I will reply. 🙂
Hi,
I played a lot of role playing in the past (Ad&D, Shadowrun, Talislanta, Sturmbringer, Paranoia, Cal of Chtuthullu etc.).
Then I stopped for several years. Some weeks ago some friends and I had the idea to play again. Im quiet fond of cyberpunk and was looking for a light weight rules system to play so I can concentrate more on the story.
So many thanks digital shades is a great system and we had an evening of real fun.
Just some questions:
What I really miss are some general checks like strength check opening a door etc. I just used the nearest physical ability like bone breaking
Are there any good ideas of how to handle NSCs quiet fast I just wrote down the description and the most necessary abilities.
What about creatures like mutant rats or what ever could happen in distant future?
What about the possibility to exchange adventures/settings with each others ??
Is it planned to have some other settings in near future like horror for example ???
Hi Zardoss,
I’m happy that you and your friends have so much good time with the game 🙂
There are some setting adaptions currently in development. The one with the greatest progress so far is “The Agency”. It focuses on adventures like one can see in the X-Files. Player characters will be government agents who deal with all sorts of supernatural things. It will also contain rules for experiencing horror and fear. The Agency will have (of course) its own set of specialities and some new competences as well. One of them will be “Beef”. It covers that strength check need, you wrote about. (In my digital shades games I also used “Runner” for it in the past, because it is some sort of atheltics. Bone breaker works fine too.)
If erverything will integrate nicely within the rule mechanic, digital_shades itself will be updated too.
Basically I make NPCs like you do: I ask myself who that person is and what s/he can do. Then I give the NPCs some competences/upgrades.
Here are some examples from one of my posts in this thread:
Dangerous animals would get 2 competece boxes in their main field, adjust health boxes according to your setting.
Hm.. I should do an addon on the NPC topic…
Adventures and settings:
I’m working on that, but progress is very slow due to work. They will be available in the download section.
I have written several digital_shades adventures, but there must still be refined for a proper upload
By the way: If you, or anyone, want to share adventures, scenarios, settings with others, I can put them in the download section of the blog. The material must not infringe any copyright however.
I hope I replied satisfactory to your questions so far. Let me know if there is more. 🙂
Hi,
thanks a lot for the answers.
I will use the ideas i the next adventure(when ever it will be because we are all quiet busy)
And sorry for replying late but you know the time problem.
May be I get the time some how to rework and translate the adventure I wrote. English is not my native language and so I will have to translate.
But I can´t promise to do because I´m quiet busy at the moment.
The Agency sound great also I mostly prefer the Old school Lovecraft kind of horror scenarios or something similar.
By the way I just had a remark from one of my players, in lots of cyberpunk settings there is something like the rigger control. I just used the up link and instead of advanced hacking suit I created advanced vehicle remote control, giving +1 on control for “rigged” vehicles and allowing the remote control of drones or similar.
Above I read in one of the comments about “new” combat rules.
I like th idea of adding an initiative throw to the fight system.
May be every character rolls a number of d6 equal to his/her ability and the highest number starts. To be honest, this would lead to the question of reflex booster as a new cyber ware right ??
I also like the idea of adding the hard armor ( described above) may be just for police or military troops and making it illegal for the players.
My last adventures were all more or less cyber punk gun novels like, so no need to deal with hacking rules, but I like the hacking rules in one of the comments above. I guess one day I will have to deal with this topic.
I personally like the idea of a “pure” Cyberpunk game like in the Wiliam Gibson novels, but got the question of adding magic and or other races to the game like a famous existing system ( I guess you know what I´m talking about).
What I really miss is some rules about vehicles, especially because I´m thinking about an evening of star blind and there of course you need star ships right and It would be great to find some rules for other races ( aliens).
My idea of other races is quiet simple:
Giving them a name and description: writing it down under description.
Give them some minus and plus and may be a disadvantage.
Examples:
Critters:
small mutant, reptilian humanoids
+1 to to shadow and detective
Teeth and claws can be used as weapons
-1 to bone breaking and deals
allergic reaction to sun light
Trogs:
big humanoid race
+1 to bone breaking, samurai and tough bastard
-1 to show-off, shadow and deals
Thick skin which works like “armor”
Really big so easy target: +1 to hit for NSC
Ethereous:
Elf like humanoid beings:
+1 to show-off and deals ( may be the vamp ability which you mentioned above would also fit)
-1 to tough bastard and bone breaking
Advantage/disadvantage: ???
Just some ideas for adding alien or mutant races in an easy way without changing the system.
What do you think about it ???
For vehicles I´m still thinking !!!
Best regards
Zardoss
Hello, SIMPLE ROLEPLAYING!
I am a P&P RPG user living in South Korea. I happened to see the RPG that you created, digital shade, and it looked very fun and interesting.
The thing is, at Seoul, there is a RPG-related event coming up on August 2018. As a participant, I would like to translate your RPG and introduce it to the other RPG players in Korea.
I would like to print about one or two hundred copies of your RPG, and hand it out to the people who visit the event. I will only charge them of the minimum printing costs, so it may as well be nonprofit.
Would this – as in printing your work and handing them out nonprofit – be okay, or would there be any conditions to doing this?
I hope that your work would be widely known.
Hi,
yes, you can do that. Of course you can cover your printing costs, as long it remains nonprofit. digital_shades is a nonprofit project. There are no conditions. Just the Creative Commons License has to be part of the translation, like in every digital_shades PDF.
Thank you for doing this! 😀 When you have a translation, can you send me a copy via email or a link, please? I would like to post it on the blog, so it will be available here too.
Cheers,
Michael
Hey Prisma!
I was thinking about the auto fire issue and this is my take on it:
So, every weapon capable of firing in full auto should have a score: from 2 to 4 should be a start. So this score is the number of 1d6 attacks it can fires. So for example if your weapon has a score of 3, it can fire 3 times with 1d6 each time.
Now, you can distribute your score in the Guns skill between one or more of those attacks knowing you can’t get more than 3 dice.
So regarding our example above, a character with a value of 2 in the Guns skill firing with the same weapon (score of 3 in auto fire) could fire shoot 2 attacks at 2d6 and 1 attack at d6 or one attack at 3d6 and the remaining 2 at 1d6 each.
So yes it gives basically free dice to the shooter BUT you have to keep ALL the results so if one or more attacks get a 1 for instance, you might be in a lot of troubles: your weapon is out of ammo or jammed or you had to expose yourself to retaliation as you were spraying away and lose your cover, and so on. So all in all it still favorise characters with a high score in Guns.
Then, if you like to give some of those weapons (especially expensive/rare ones) some recoil compensator you can just declare that it ignores one result of 1 (that’s what I implemented in my own games) but that’s another topic.
Oh and before ending, if the character is unskilled in Guns then every attack gets the -2 so yes he might have more chance to hit something (or someone) but he’s up for a lot of trouble (think Pulp Fiction when the guy tried to shoot Travolta and Jackson at the beginning of the movie 😉 )
So what do you think?
Hi Dream Argonaut!
I’m glad to hear from you again! (Sorry, for the late reply, it’s a busy time for me, but I will reply as soon as I manage.) I’m looking to improve parts of the game and toy with ideas from time to time. I like your idea to make autofire more interesting. Giving more dice in that situation is a possibility I discussed with some of my players in the past, but without any solution yet. I will try your autofire rule the next time I get to play a SIMPLE system game. Did you do a playtest it within your group yet? I’m very interested.
Cheers
Michael
Hi Prisma!
Unfortunately they didn’t use the rules last time nor did they use any gun for that matter. But they will come to it pretty soon I’d reckon.
Cheers!
This is a great little system 🙂 Cant wait for a chance to play it :3
Thank you! 🙂